I am so disappointed to see the politicians at work again, this time attempting to make changes that will mar the aesthetics of our community. The current bridge, its design and its decorative stone, adds immeasurably to the beauty of our subdivision. Why would we want to replace it with a cookie-cutter bridge that is most unsuitable to the entire area? Why not spend the money that they seem so eager to disperse on flood control? That would improve the lives of so many people. Repair the bridge and let us enjoy living here.
Barbara Butler said:
I am so disappointed to see the politicians at work again, this time attempting to make changes that will mar the aesthetics of our community. The current bridge, its design and its decorative stone, adds immeasurably to the beauty of our subdivision. Why would we want to replace it with a cookie-cutter bridge that is most unsuitable to the entire area? Why not spend the money that they seem so eager to disperse on flood control? That would improve the lives of so many people. Repair the bridge and let us enjoy living here.
1 Comment
Joanne Leiman
7/1/2012 08:08:33 am
Just this afternoon, my husband and I saw a car speeding down Briarwood at a very high speed. So fast that we had to swerve off to the side of the road. Luckily, a police car chased him down and made a stop, but not after crossing the bridge. Thankfully, no one was on the bridge at the time. This is just one reason why Briarwood, and the bridge, should not be changed to accommodate more traffic or a higher speed limit. The speed limit needs to be lowered and the bridge should be left as is since it's part of the character of the neighborhood. Fix it, don't replace it. The speed limit should be reduced to 20mph like it is in Creekside.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
To view comments from prior months, please click a month under Archives (below)
|